top of page

Unlocking Mental Well-being: iflow Psychology
Your Trusted Resource for Psychological Support

Your Sydney Psychologists, Australia.

Is Social Media Addictive? Understanding the Neuroscience, the Risks, and How to Support Young People

  • Writer:  Dean Harrison - Counselling Psychologist
    Dean Harrison - Counselling Psychologist
  • Dec 16
  • 6 min read

By iflow Psychology — Gladesville, Sydney Evidence-based guidance for families navigating the digital world


Introduction: Why Everyone Is Talking About “Social Media Addiction”

We’re seeing families arrive with the same concern: a bright, capable teenager who can’t seem to put the phone down — and parents who feel they’re losing connection while trying to do the ‘right thing’. With Australia preparing to restrict social media access for under-16s, conversations about “social media addiction” have exploded. Parents are asking:

  • “Is my child addicted?”

  • “Why can’t they just stop scrolling?”

  • “Is this like gambling or drugs?”

  • “What if the upcoming ban makes things worse?”


The truth is nuanced.


Most young people are not “addicted” in the clinical sense. But a subset develop compulsive, high-risk patterns of use that mirror behavioural addictions such as gambling — and this is especially concerning in children and adolescents whose brains are still developing.


This article explains:

  • what social media addiction actually is

  • how platforms activate reward pathways in the brain

  • how emotional and developmental vulnerabilities sharpen the risk

  • why teens struggle more than adults

  • what the research says

  • what parents can do to reduce harm


This is a clinically informed, evidence-based, non-alarmist guide designed to help families understand the science and take practical action.


Primary school–aged children sitting side by side outdoors, each using a smartphone or tablet, illustrating early social media and screen use in children and its impact on attention, connection, and development.

1. What Is Social Media Addiction? (And What It Isn’t)

“Social media addiction” is not formally listed as a disorder in the DSM-5, but psychologists widely recognise a pattern known as Problematic Social Media Use (PSMU) or Compulsive Social Networking Use.


It is best understood as a behavioural addiction, involving:

  • Salience: Social media becomes the dominant activity of the day.

  • Mood modification: Use is driven by the need to change emotional states — soothing boredom, anxiety, loneliness or distress.

  • Tolerance: Time spent online increases over time to achieve the same emotional effect.

  • Withdrawal: Irritability, restlessness, cravings or anxiety when access is removed.

  • Conflict: Strained relationships, school disruption, loss of sleep, secrecy, lying about use.

  • Relapse: A return to heavy use after attempted breaks.


This behavioural pattern is neurologically similar to gambling addiction, driven not by chemicals, but by reinforcement loops that hijack reward circuitry.


2. The Neuroscience: Why Social Media Is So Hard to Put Down

Decades of neuroscience research reveal three key mechanisms:


a. Dopamine & reward pathways

Every “like”, mention, comment, or notification delivers a dopamine hit to the brain’s reward centres — the same regions activated by:

  • gambling machines

  • certain recreational drugs

  • sugar

  • novelty-seeking behaviour


Social media platforms use variable-ratio reinforcement, the most addictive reward schedule known in behavioural science — the same pattern that makes poker machines highly compulsive.


The unpredictability (“Will someone like my post?”) amplifies the reward cycle.


b. Self-disclosure as a reward

Harvard neuroimaging research shows that talking about ourselves activates strong reward responses. Offline, people speak about themselves roughly 30–40% of the time. Online, that figure goes up to 80%.


This fuels a powerful self-reinforcement loop.


c. Algorithmic emotional amplification

Algorithms favour "click-bait":

  • emotionally charged content

  • high-arousal posts (anger, envy, excitement)

  • visually idealised images

  • attention-grabbing extremes


This means that adolescents — whose emotional processing is still developing — are exposed to a constantly heightened psychological environment.


3. Why Teens Are More Vulnerable than Adults

A young person is not simply a “smaller adult”. Their brain is undergoing rapid structural change.


Key vulnerabilities:


a. Underdeveloped impulse control

The prefrontal cortex (responsible for self-control) is still maturing into the mid-20s.


b. Hyperactive reward system

The adolescent brain responds more intensely to social rewards, including likes, messages, and peer approval.


The two factors above are why a 14-year-old can fully understand the rules at dinner, agree to them — and still find themselves scrolling under the table ten minutes later.


c. Heightened social sensitivity

Identity formation depends heavily on peer feedback — online platforms supercharge this.


d. Emotion regulation challenges

Teens use social media to cope with sadness, loneliness, boredom or anxiety, reinforcing dependency.


e. Social comparison effects

Teen girls are particularly vulnerable to impacts on:

  • body image

  • perfectionism

  • self-esteem

  • social anxiety


This is amplified by filtered images and algorithm-driven content.


4. The Mental Health Impacts: What the Evidence Shows

A carefully balanced reading of the research shows:


✔ Social media can negatively impact mental health when:

  • use is excessive

  • there is comparison to idealised images

  • cyberbullying occurs

  • sleep is disrupted

  • social displacement happens

  • emotional regulation depends on online feedback


✔ Some adolescents are more at risk, including:

  • those with anxiety or depression

  • neurodivergent youth

  • socially isolated teens

  • teens with body image concerns

  • teens with family conflict or trauma history


The abstinence paradox

The new 2025 meta-analysis you provided demonstrates:


Short-term abstinence does NOT improve:

  • positive affect

  • negative affect

  • life satisfaction


And in some cases, abstinence produced:

  • more boredom

  • more loneliness

  • stronger cravings

  • increased FOMO

  • emotional distress


In clinical practice, this makes sense as removing the behaviour does not remove the underlying needs. Clinically, we often see an initial spike in distress after sudden restrictions, not because social media is ‘good’, but because it was quietly holding together unmet emotional needs.

Removing the behaviour does not remove the underlying needs.

This is why restricting access without support can lead to:

  • emotional volatility

  • substitute addictions (gaming, AI chatbots, riskier platforms)

  • withdrawal symptoms

  • secrecy and deception

  • worsening mental health symptoms


5. How to Recognise Social Media Addiction in a Teen

Parents often ask: “How do I know if it’s addiction or just normal teenage behaviour?”


Look for patterns that cause functional impairment:

  • inability to reduce use

  • lying about usage

  • extreme distress during limits

  • sleep loss

  • school decline

  • withdrawal from offline activities

  • irritability when offline

  • loss of interest in hobbies

  • constant checking and FOMO

  • using social media to escape problems


If three or more of these occur regularly, seek professional guidance.


6. What Actually Helps: Evidence-Based Strategies for Families

Families often come in asking for rules. What actually helps is understanding why the rules keep breaking down. Here is what research and clinical experience support:


a. Don’t rely on bans alone

Restrictions without emotional support increase distress and workarounds.


b. Co-regulate rather than control

This means:

  • calm conversations

  • problem-solving together

  • shared decision-making

  • connection before correction


c. Build replacement habits

Teens need alternative ways to meet the same needs:

  • belonging → in-person social groups

  • boredom → hobbies, sport, creativity

  • emotion regulation → mindfulness, exercise, therapy

  • identity → strengths, passions, real-world achievements


d. Create predictable routines

Set boundaries for:

  • no phones in bedrooms

  • no devices at meals

  • homework before screens

  • structured downtime


Consistency beats rigidity.


e. Support emotional literacy

Help teens understand:

  • what they feel

  • why they reach for their phone

  • how to regulate emotions offline


If your teenager is struggling with emotional regulation, social comparison, or distress linked to online use, teen therapy can help build coping skills, emotional insight, and healthier digital habits.


f. Encourage “conscious use”

Ask reflective questions:

  • “What do you notice about your mood after scrolling?”

  • “Which platforms make you feel energised?”

  • “Who online makes you feel unsafe or insecure?”


Insight is protective.


g. Monitor for red flags

Seek support if you observe:

  • persistent sadness

  • school refusal

  • aggression

  • relationship withdrawal

  • major sleep disruption

  • secrecy around devices

  • self-harm content

  • cyberbullying

  • extreme reactions to limits


7. How iflow Psychology Can Help

We support adolescents and families with:

  • emotional regulation

  • digital wellbeing

  • anxiety and depression

  • compulsive behaviours

  • social comparison issues

  • body image difficulties

  • cyberbullying recovery

  • parent coaching

  • family communication

  • transitioning through the national restrictions


We also support parents through parenting support, helping families navigate boundaries, communication, and emotional regulation during periods of developmental and social change.


Supporting digital wellbeing involves helping young people regulate emotions, manage comparison, and build meaningful offline connections.


Evidence-based therapies include:

  • CBT

  • ACT

  • DBT-informed strategies

  • motivational interviewing

  • family systems approaches


We offer in-person sessions in Gladesville and telehealth across Australia.


Evidence Base & Further Reading

This article is informed by current psychological and neuroscientific research, as well as established clinical frameworks used in child, adolescent, and family psychology.


Key sources and evidence bases include:

  • Research on problematic social media use (PSMU) and behavioural addictions, including models drawn from gambling and reward-based reinforcement systems

  • Neuroscience research on adolescent brain development, particularly the maturation of the prefrontal cortex and heightened reward sensitivity during adolescence

  • Meta-analyses and longitudinal studies examining associations between social media use, mental health, sleep, emotional regulation, and wellbeing in young people

  • Psychological research on variable-ratio reinforcement schedules, dopamine pathways, and habit formation

  • Guidance from reputable organisations such as the American Psychological Association (APA), World Health Organization (WHO), Australian Institute of Family Studies, and the eSafety Commissioner.

  • Clinically informed approaches to harm reduction, family-based interventions, and digital wellbeing support


This content reflects current best practice in psychological care and public mental health education. It is intended to support understanding and informed decision-making, not to replace individual assessment or therapeutic advice.


If you are concerned about your child’s wellbeing or emotional regulation around social media use, a psychologist can help assess underlying needs and support healthier coping strategies.

The first step is the hardest.

We’re here to support you with the next.

bottom of page